In a dramatic twist in the ongoing saga surrounding Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, the royal palace has issued a cease and desist order to their Archwell Foundation.
This move comes in response to staff members sporting pins that prominently feature the couple’s royal monogram.
The situation has reignited discussions about the Sussexes’ attempts to retain a semblance of their royal status, with critics suggesting that they are desperately trying to position themselves as American royalty.
The incident unfolded during Prince Harry’s recent trip to New York, where he attended the UN General Assembly High-Level Week and Climate Week.
Amidst the bustle of events, one of his aides was spotted wearing the contentious pin, which many perceive as a blatant effort to cling to their past royal life.
As the couple has distanced themselves from official royal duties and made the U.S. their home, this latest action has drawn sharp criticism.
Social media users have not held back in expressing their opinions.
One commenter bluntly stated, “If you need any more evidence that Harry and Meghan are pathetically trying to be America’s royals, this is it.” Another user went even further, labeling them as “make-believe, sick, prince and princess in the USA,” questioning whether they feel any embarrassment in their pursuit of relevance.
The palace’s decision to intervene signals a clear message: the couple’s efforts to maintain ties to their royal heritage are not being well-received.
This action comes against a backdrop of escalating tensions between the Sussexes and the royal family, exacerbated by the couple’s high-profile interviews and allegations of racism within the institution.
Each incident seems to deepen the rift, leaving many to wonder about the future of their relationship with the monarchy.
This latest controversy over the Archwell pins is merely the newest chapter in a long narrative that paints the Sussexes as desperate for attention.
From their extravagant wedding to their bombshell Oprah Winfrey interview, critics argue that the couple has leveraged their royal connections to advance their personal agendas and sustain their celebrity status.
Commentators have drawn parallels between the Sussexes’ pins and the insignia typically worn by ambassadors or politicians, suggesting that such displays are more fitting for those in official capacities.
One user pointed out that even William and Catherine’s staff do not wear anything so ostentatious, further emphasizing the perceived absurdity of the situation.
Moreover, the palace’s cease and desist order appears to be a calculated move to distance the royal family from the Sussexes’ controversial actions.
The couple’s recent trip to Colombia, criticized as a “free press trip” and labeled as “poverty porn,” has raised eyebrows, prompting speculation that the palace is eager to safeguard the monarchy’s image.
A travel industry PR expert weighed in, describing the Colombia trip as effectively a free ride, suggesting that the Sussexes are now akin to social media influencers rather than royals.
This sentiment reflects a growing perception that the couple is increasingly detached from their former royal roles.
As the public continues to track the evolving dynamics between the Sussexes and the palace, the Archwell pin controversy adds another layer to this captivating story.
