Prince Harry purportedly made an attempt to influence King Charles’s decision to relinquish his ownership of Frogmore Cottage by posing a query pertaining to Arch and Lilibet. The French publication that published this information has distributed additional extracts from Omid Scobie’s book”Endgame.” According to Scobie, Harry allegedly inquired of the monarch, “Do you no longer desire to see your grandchildren?” The inquiry was purposefully presented in order to provoke a response from the King, as Harry begged to retain Frogmore Cottage, his former residence in the United Kingdom.
It has been reported that Harry issued an ultimatum to his father subsequent to the publication of his memoir, “Spare,” which reflected the monarch’s request that Harry and Meghan Markle return the keys to the Windsor residence. In March, it was announced that this action, nicknamed “Frogxit,” had been taken, with King Charles evicting Harry from the residence and transferring the keys to Prince Andrew.
According to Scobie’s account, Harry allegedly used his grandchildren Archie and Lilibet against his father in an attempt to sway the King’s opinion. On the contrary, this account is refuted by Royal expert Neil Shaw, who asserts that Meghan was the one who communicated with the King via emissary subsequent to her removal from Frogmore. She inquired whether he desired to reunite with his grandchildren, demonstrating her indignation over the property’s loss. Megan had always held the belief that she could leverage the children against the king. King Charles has notably not encountered Archie and Lilibet.
The announcement regarding the bestowal of the titles of prince and princess by King Charles has yet to be made public by the royal family or their representatives. Meghan, as stated by Scobie, never felt genuinely at home in the United Kingdom and has no plans to return. She reportedly declined to attend the coronation of King Charles in London in an effort to disassociate herself from the royal drama.
A royal expert, Angela L, commented on a tweet by royal commentator Nal Gardner, which referred to Meghan Markle as a “Monumental liar” and criticised her campaign against the British royal family. Gardner had labelled Markle a “Monumental liar.” According to Angela L, the author of a biography on Prince Harry, Harry specified that the discussion regarding the baby’s skin tone occurred prior to Meghan’s pregnancy. This implies that they might have inquired about the likelihood of the baby also having ginger hair. Angela holds the belief that Meghan’s endeavours to undermine the royal family will prove futile, as they will merely inflict harm upon her own reputation.
Meghan’s statements follow reports that she identified two royal household members who purportedly engaged in conversations regarding the complexion of the infant. Reportedly, she informed King Charles of this in a letter she penned subsequent to her and Harry’s separation from the royal family. Meghan previously stated in their infamous 2021 Oprah Winfrey interview that a member of the royal family had expressed apprehensions regarding the newborn Archie’s skin tone. Scobie’s book, nevertheless, refrains from revealing the identities of those individuals. After the interview, Harry and Meghan verified that the Queen and the Duke of Edinburgh were not participants in the discussion. Queen Elizabeth expressed concern regarding the allegations during the interview, observing that recollections may differ.
