The speculation surrounding Meghan Markle’s pregnancies has sparked a wave of theories suggesting the use of surrogate mothers for the birth of her children, Archie and Lilibet.
Numerous factors contribute to these suspicions, prompting a closer examination of the facts at hand.
One significant aspect that fuels the speculations is Meghan’s age, a common consideration among individuals of affluent backgrounds.
Reports surfaced indicating that prior to her marriage, Meghan had her eggs frozen for Archie instead of relying on Royal Doctors and Hospitals.
Instead, she opted for the UK’s leading hospital for surrogacy services, a decision that raised eyebrows within the public sphere.
Adding to the intrigue, Meghan was also accused of employing fake baby bumps, aligning with a prevalent trend where women showcase a perfect bump only to shed the weight rapidly post-delivery, earning them the moniker of “Superwoman” in the media.
The controversy deepened when Archie’s birth certificate, completed by Prince Harry 11 days after his son’s birth, revealed that he was born at the Portland Hospital, a renowned private maternity facility in London.
Despite the subsequent media frenzy, the hospital’s spokesperson refrained from confirming the association with the Sussexes, citing confidentiality obligations.
Years later, Meghan addressed the circumstances surrounding Archie’s birth in a Netflix documentary, shedding light on her decision to forego St. Mary’s Hospital, the traditional birthing place for royal women.
She emphasized her longstanding relationship with her doctor based at the Portland Hospital, underscoring the trust she placed in their care during her pregnancy.
Contrasting practices between the US and the UK emerged as a point of contention, with Meghan’s choice of a private doctor tied to a specific hospital reflecting American norms rather than British protocols.
This distinction was further highlighted by a UK parenting coach, emphasizing the flexibility of private doctors in attending deliveries across various hospitals.
Moreover, Meghan’s concerns about the birthing process, particularly due to her age-related high-risk pregnancy at 37, added complexity to the narrative.
Her disclosure of apprehension regarding potential complications, including the possibility of a C-section, underscored the challenges she faced during this period.
The absence of an emergency department at the Portland Hospital, as noted by a midwife associated with the facility, raised questions about the suitability of Meghan’s choice for delivery.
In contrast, St. Mary’s Hospital, favored by many royals, boasted emergency care facilities, signaling a contrasting approach to maternity services.
Furthermore, Meghan’s explanations for not posing with her newborn outside the hospital varied over time, from safety concerns for her child, as mentioned in the Oprah interview, to logistical constraints preventing such public appearances, as revealed in the recent Netflix series.
These shifting narratives added layers to the ongoing scrutiny surrounding her birthing experiences.
Drawing parallels to a past royal birth at the Portland Hospital, Sarah Ferguson, Duchess of York, who delivered her daughters there in the late 1980s and early 1990s, highlighted a historical context to Meghan’s choice of maternity facility.
Fergie’s public appearances with her newborns outside the hospital stood in contrast to Meghan’s more private approach, showcasing the evolving dynamics within the royal family.
As the complexities surrounding Meghan Markle’s birthing decisions continue to unfold, the intersection of personal choice, medical practices, and public scrutiny underscores the intricate nature of royal pregnancies and births, inviting further contemplation on the nuances of tradition and modernity within the British monarchy.
