They told the National Enquirer, via RadarOnline: “Her Majesty was furious Harry flew in from his ritzy California home without getting palace approval – and came with an attitude.” Charles and Camilla do not currently live at Buckingham Palace, which is undergoing extensive renovations, but at the nearby royal residence in London called Clarence House. Kerr said it was likely that Camilla would maintain at least temporary residence there in the event of her husband’s death.
“I’m told Camilla was outraged. She’s taken a lot of bile from Harry for years and couldn’t wait to let him have it.” They explained: “Camilla has taken it all on the chin, but using her husband’s cancer as a ‘loving son’ PR stunt was the last straw.
The source added the Queen could not take Harry “using her husband’s cancer as a ‘loving son’ PR”.
“Naturally, I’m disappointed,” Harry admitted, his voice low but firm. “The Invictus Games hold a special place in my heart. To be denied the opportunity to participate alongside my fellow veterans is a…” he paused, searching for the right words, “a difficult pill to swallow.”
Rumors had swirled for weeks about tensions between the Sussexes and the royal family, fueled by their tell-all interviews and the ongoing rift with certain members. The Invictus Games snub, as many called it, seemed to solidify the divide.
“Look,” Harry continued, his gaze resolute, “I understand there are complexities at play. But at the end of the day, the Invictus Games are about the spirit of camaraderie, of resilience, of proving that anything is possible. To exclude anyone based on anything other than merit goes against the very foundation of what the Games represent.”
His words resonated with veterans and supporters worldwide, many expressing their outrage on social media. #StandWithHarry trended, filled with messages of solidarity and criticism of the decision-making process.
However, not everyone shared the sentiment. Royal commentators argued that the decision was made to protect the neutrality of the Games, fearing undue media attention on Harry would overshadow the true purpose of the event.
Meanwhile, within the palace walls, the news was met with mixed reactions. Some, like Princess Eugenie, known for her close bond with Harry, expressed their disappointment privately. Others, however, reportedly felt the decision was justified, believing Harry’s presence would create an unnecessary distraction.
As the controversy raged on, Harry remained focused on his mission. He used the platform to highlight the work of his foundation and the importance of supporting veterans, subtly deflecting attention away from the drama.
Whether Harry finds a way to participate in the Invictus Games or not remains to be seen. But one thing is certain: the decision has reignited discussions about the monarchy’s role in modern society, the line between duty and personal choice, and the complexities of family estrangement on a global stage.
