In a surprising turn of events, a recently published letter has cast doubt on Prince Harry’s claim that he and Meghan Markle were completely cut off by the royal family after they left the UK.
The letter, written by Sir Edward Young, the late queen’s private secretary, defends Harry and Meghan’s right to security and contradicts the narrative that they were stripped of their taxpayer-funded security.
This revelation raises questions about the validity of Harry’s lawsuit against the UK government.
Harry and Meghan’s decision to file lawsuits has become a familiar pattern, with Harry now taking legal action against his own family’s government.
The lawsuit revolves around the UK government’s decision to remove their taxpayer-funded security when they stepped down as working royals and moved to the US.
Harry claims that this decision put them in danger and argues that he has a right to security when he returns to the UK as the son of the king.
However, the newly published letter from Sir Edward Young challenges this narrative.
It reveals that the royal family did not have a role in the decision to strip Harry and Meghan of their security.
The letter emphasizes the importance of ensuring the safety of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex due to their public profiles and the history of targeting the family by extremists.
It also states that decisions regarding publicly funded security are ultimately made by the UK government.
The letter does not mention the alleged offer made by Harry to pay for his own security during the Sandringham Summit.
